Legal Opinion

Szekeres v. Szekeres

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 1, 2011No. 30337, 30338, 30339PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

These consolidated appeals stem from a family dispute regarding the use and occupancy and ownership of certain real property. The plaintiffs, Steven Szekeres and Denise Miller, appeal from the judgments of the trial court, following a jury trial, in favor of the various defendants, Joyce Szekeres, Chaker Dridi and Stephanie Dridi. 1 We affirm the judgments of the trial court.

The following facts, as reasonably could have been found by the jury, and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the plaintiffs’ appeals. Until approximately February 1, 2000, Steven…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Appleton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Carrol v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Naples v. Keystone Building & Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Graham v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. Dinardo Seaside Tower, Ltd. v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  3. HASLAM-JAMES v. LawrenceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Szekeres v. DridiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. Szekeres v. SzekeresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API