Charton v. Harkey
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J.
Code of Civil Procedure section 1032 gives a “prevailing party” the right to recover its litigation costs. (§ 1032, subd. (b).) It is undisputed defendant and respondent Diane L. Harkey meets section 1032’s definition of a prevailing party. Plaintiffs and appellants (Plaintiffs), 2 however, contend the trial court erred in awarding Harkey her costs because she was united in interest and shared costs with other defendants who did not satisfy the statutory definition. In support, Plaintiffs rely on cases applying the so-called unity of interest exception, which provides a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Zhang v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Williams v. Chino Valley Independent Fire DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Textron Financial Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Friends of Spring St. v. Nev. City, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Quiles v. Parent, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Huerta v. Kava Holdings, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Anthony v. LiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Anthony v. LiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.