Legal Opinion

Peters v. Ætna Life Insurance Co. of Hartford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1937No. Docket No. 37, Calendar No. 39,267PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, C. J.

Plaintiff brought action on a group insurance policy for death of her son, Chester Peters. The policy provides:

“The insurance of any employee shall automatically cease when the employee fails to make the required premium contribution, or upon termination of employment; except that if any employee is absent on account of sickness or injury, temporarily laid off, granted leave of absence, pensioned or retired, his insurance shall continue until it is terminated by the employer.”

It also contained the conversion privilege upon termination of employment and provision for individual certificates to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ozanich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Powell v. Equitable Life Assur. Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. Zeigler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. Wilson v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Travelers Insurance v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Allen W. Bliss v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Knowles-Zeswitz Music, Inc. v. CaraCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1969
  3. Edwards v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United StatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  4. Lineberger v. Security Life & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Peters v. &198tna Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API