Legal Opinion

Morinelli v. H. P. Garin Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1930No. Appeal 172PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldeige, J.,

This was an action of assumpsit begun on December 3, 1929, by issuing a foreign attachment; on January 21, 1930, an affidavit of cause of action in assumpsit was filed; and on February 4,1930, a rule was granted at the instance of the Market Street National Bank, garnishee, to show cause why the attachment should not be dissolved. This rule was made absolute, which is the cause of appellant’s complaint.

It is contended upon the part of the appellant that the learned court below failed to consider a supplemental affidavit filed by him. It appears from the opinion filed by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Western Turf Assn. v. GreenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Raymond v. LeishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Selover, Bates & Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Mindlin v. Saxony Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kohl v. Lyons (O'malley)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Konopka Et Ux. v. McAteerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Rex v. Paramount Rubber Co. of New JerseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Edmunds v. Barascope Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. General Maintenance Engineers, Inc. v. Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API