General Maintenance Engineers, Inc. v. Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
This is an appeal by the garnishee Rohm & Haas Oo. from the order of the court below entering a judgment against the garnishee on a foreign attachment and from an order of the court discharging a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be stricken off. '
On February 7, 1951, the plaintiff, General Maintenance Engineers, Inc., instituted suit by a foreign attachment summoning Rohm & Haas Oo. as garnishee of funds belonging to Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp., the non-resident defendant. An affidavit of cause of action was filed the same day. The defendant never entered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Raymond v. LeishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Mindlin v. Saxony Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Konopka Et Ux. v. McAteerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Melloy's Sons v. Deal & BurtisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- McLeod v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Posner v. SheridanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- BALANCED BRIDGE FUNDING LLC v. MITNICK LAW OFFICE, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Posner v. SheridanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973