Legal Opinion

General Maintenance Engineers, Inc. v. Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1954No. Appeal, No. 55PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This is an appeal by the garnishee Rohm & Haas Oo. from the order of the court below entering a judgment against the garnishee on a foreign attachment and from an order of the court discharging a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be stricken off. '

On February 7, 1951, the plaintiff, General Maintenance Engineers, Inc., instituted suit by a foreign attachment summoning Rohm & Haas Oo. as garnishee of funds belonging to Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp., the non-resident defendant. An affidavit of cause of action was filed the same day. The defendant never entered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Raymond v. LeishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Mindlin v. Saxony Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Konopka Et Ux. v. McAteerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Melloy's Sons v. Deal & BurtisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. McLeod v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Posner v. SheridanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. BALANCED BRIDGE FUNDING LLC v. MITNICK LAW OFFICE, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. Posner v. SheridanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API