Legal Opinion

Kohl v. Lyons (O'malley)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 1936No. Appeal, 260PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is an appeal from the refusal of the court below to quash a writ of foreign attachment. The question for our consideration is whether it appears from the record before us that the court below erred in refusing to quash the writ. The record consists of affidavit of cause of action, plaintiff’s statement of claim in assumpsit, and petition of garnishee for rule to show cause why writ of foreign attachment should not be quashed. Rule to quash the writ was issued and then discharged by the court below. This appeal by the garnishee followed.

If the affidavit of cause of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Raymond v. LeishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Pasquinelli v. Southern Macaroni Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Mindlin v. Saxony Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. G. B. Hurt, Inc. v. Fuller Canneries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Frankel v. Donehoo (Nesbitt)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Magel v. SpringsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Alpers v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Barrett v. First Mechanics National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Dulles v. DullesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Warner Company v. BRANN & STUART COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API