Legal Opinion

Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 21, 1960No. Reap. Dec. 9724; Entry No. 407PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

Pursuant to section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1501), as amended, plaintiff has filed the instant appeal for a reappraisement to determine the proper dutiable value of certain mechanical calendars imported from Denmark.

The issue is so clearly presented by an agreement of the parties hereto that it is deemed appropriate to set forth in full a written stipulation, which was received in evidence as plaintiff’s exhibit 1.(1) It is hereby stipulated ánd agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant1 Attorney General for the United States,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. ex rel. Munising Wood Products Co.United States Customs Court · 1954
  2. R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Henry A. Wess, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Cavalier Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API