Legal Opinion

A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 20, 1960No. Reap. Dec. 9818PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Counsel in the cases listed on the attached schedule, made a part hereof, have filed statements which purport to meet the requirements of rule 15(d). In fact, they do not meet the requirement.

The rule requires each party to file, as a minimum, “a short, plain, and direct statement showing (1) the statutory basis of value contended for by that party, and (2) the unit value claimed to be the correct value of the merchandise.”

Plaintiff has filed a 3-page document which is, in effect, a brief in support of its pending motion to suspend. It is not the statement required by rule…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Nelson Bead Co.United States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. F. C. Gerlach & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API