State v. Childs
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
O’Donnell, Judge.
William Childs appeals from a judgment of the common pleas court classifying him as a “sexual predator.” On appeal, Childs urges that his conviction for felonious assault did not constitute a sexually oriented offense and, therefore, R.C. 2950.09(C) does not apply. Childs further claims that the state failed to present clear and convincing evidence he “is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually oriented offenses” and also challenges the constitutionality of Ohio’s sexual predator law. Upon review of the record and applicable law, we reject Childs’s arguments…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. EppingerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. RobertsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. ColeOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Gebbie, C-060505 (6-22-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Shough, Unpublished Decision (2-18-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Keeney v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.