Legal Opinion

Urban Farms, Inc. v. Seel

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 16, 1965PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

87 N.J. Super. 177 (1965)

208 A.2d 434

URBAN FARMS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

ARTHUR J. SEEL AND CHARLOTTE SEEL, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided March 16, 1965.

Messrs. Gassert & Murphy, attorneys for plaintiff (Mr. Thomas S. Murphy appearing).

Mr. Sebastian Gaeta, attorney for defendants.

PASHMAN, J.S.C.

This is an action in which plaintiff corporation seeks to enjoin defendants husband and wife from violating two restrictive covenants. One covenant is found only in a written contract of sale between the parties, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Scull v. EilenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  3. Houston Petroleum Co. v. Automotive Products Credit Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. Dieckman v. WalserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  5. Weinstein v. SwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. SYRIAN ARCHDIOCESE OF NY v. Palisades Assoc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Compiano v. KuntzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. City of Westminster v. SKYLINE VISTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Urban Farms, Inc. v. SeelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  5. Quigley, Inc. v. Miller Family FarmsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API