Legal Opinion

City of Westminster v. SKYLINE VISTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 28, 1967No. 21352PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Day.

We will refer to plaintiff in error as Westminster and to defendant in error as Skyline.

The undisputed factual background for an understanding of the question involved in this writ of error is as follows: Joe and Rose LaConte were owners of a quarter section of land in an unincorporated portion of Adams County near the city of Westminster. There was situated thereon a water well, pump, reservoir and appurtenant equipment. On October 1, 1954 the LaContes conveyed the well site and equipment to three individuals (predecessors in title to Skyline). The deed from the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Chicago Title & Trust Co v. Wabash-Randolph Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Glisan v. SmolenskeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Dieckman v. WalserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  5. Enos v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Batterman v. Wells Fargo Ag Credit Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Bledsoe v. HillColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Dennett v. Mt. Harvard Development Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Skidmore v. First Bank of MinneapolisColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Downtown Parking Company, Inc. v. VorbeckColorado Court of Appeals · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API