Legal Opinion

Urban Farms, Inc. v. Seel

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 15, 1966PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

90 N.J. Super. 401 (1966)

217 A.2d 888

URBAN FARMS, INC., ETC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

ARTHUR J. SEEL AND CHARLOTTE SEEL, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 7, 1966.

Decided March 15, 1966.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.

Mr. Thomas S. Murphy argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Gassert and Murphy, attorneys).

Mr. Sebastian Gaeta argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Carlos Peay, Jr., on the brief).

2Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given in Judge Pashman's opinion in the Chancery Division, reported at 87…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Urban Farms, Inc. v. SeelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Williams v. HirshornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  3. Grobarchik v. Nasa Mortgage and Investment Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. SYRIAN ARCHDIOCESE OF NY v. Palisades Assoc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Fitzmaurice v. Van Vlaanderen MacH. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. Quigley, Inc. v. Miller Family FarmsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  4. DeWolf v. Usher Cove Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1989
  5. Wong v. MercadoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API