Legal Opinion

Beyl v. Yasukochi

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1955No. Civ. 5115PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHELL, J. pro tem. *

This is an action to quiet title to an easement over a strip of land belonging to defendant. The easement is claimed by the plaintiffs to have been established prescriptively by adverse user by themselves and their predecessors in interest across defendant’s land as a means of ingress to and egress from plaintiffs’ land. Judgment was rendered by the trial court in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant has appealed from the judgment.

Only two questions need be considered upon this appeal. They are:

1. Should the findings and judgment be modified to correctly describe the dominant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Bartholomew v. StaheliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hill v. AllanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. London Homes, Inc. v. KornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Lindsay v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Harrison v. BourisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API