Legal Opinion

Cargill Grain Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 7, 1942No. C. D. 579Published

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

This action involves several shipments of rye from Poland. The plaintiff claims that insufficient allowance was made by the collector for impurities, etc., and duty was therefore assessed upon more merchandise than entered the commerce of the country.

At the trial counsel for the parties hereto entered into the following agreement as to the facts in the case.

It is heReby stipulated and aoreed, by and between the parties hereto, by their respective attorneys:

1. On November 21, 1934 the plaintiff herein made one importation (Entry #A-70069), hereinafter called the 1934 importation…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. De VillamilCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API