Legal Opinion

Smith v. Phenix Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1890No. 13,514PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; Walter Van Dyke, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This was an action on a policy of fire insurance. Trial by the court, and finding and judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant appeals from the judgment, and the case comes up on the judgment-roll. The policy sued on contained the following clause: “If the interest of the assured in the property be other than an absolute fee simple title, or if any other person or persons have any interest whatever in the' property described, whether it be real estate or personal property, or if the building insured or containing the property insured by this policy stands on leased ground, or if there be a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hough v. City Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
  2. Washington Fire Insurance v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  3. Kerr v. DaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
  4. Stetson v. Massachusetts Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  5. Hall v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moffitt v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API