Moffitt v. Phenix Insurance
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Marion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtLotz, C. J.
The appellant sued the appellee on a fire insurance policy. The court below sustained a demurrer *234for want of facts,to each paragraph of her complaint. These rulings are the errors assigned in this court.
The facts as alleged in the first paragraph are, in substance, that on the 9th day of January, 1893, the defendant (appellee), for value, executed its policy of insurance whereby it agreed to indemnify one F. B. Rooker against loss or damages by fire to an amount not to exceed the actual cash value of the property described in the policy, and in no event to exceed $600 on said Rooker’s one and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williamsburg City Fire Insurance v. CaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Continental Insurance v. MunnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Illinois Fire Insurance v. StantonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Louisville Underwriters v. DurlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.