Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 1942No. Civ. No. 13575PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, J. pro tem.

Plaintiffs on or about February 3, 1928, borrowed from Fidelity Savings & Loan Association $15,000, payable at the rate of $210 per month with interest at 8.4 per cent per annum, secured by deed of trust upon a 13-unit bungalow court property owned by them at Montebello, California. Soon thereafter an additional borrowing of $1,500, secured by the same trust deed, increased the indebtedness to a total of $16,500. In June, 1935, the unpaid principal balance upon the indebtedness amounted to $11,118.56, and interest was owing from December 5, 1934. Before that date Fidelity…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Lockhart v. J. H. McDougall Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co. v. Abner Doble Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Giberson v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. French v. MacNiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API