Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. J. H. McDougall Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1923No. L. A. No. 7193PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

This is an action to redeem certain real property from the lien of a mortgage. Plaintiffs obtained a judgment fixing the amount due and providing that upon payment thereof defendant should execute a deed to them. The principal controversy between the parties was over the question of whether or not the transaction between them was shown by parol to be a mortgage or was a contract of sale of the real estate in question entered into between the defendant corporation as vendor and the plaintiffs as vendees, as it purported to be. The action was originally brought by Otis H. Lockhart and Cora S.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Stein v. LeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Malone v. RoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Harding v. Home Investment & Savings Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Nesbit v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API