Legal Opinion

In Re Abrams' Will

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 8, 1938No. 27858PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This cause involves the validity of an instrument offered for probate as a holographic will. It appears that the will in question was found among testatrix’s papers after her death. It is testamentary in character and bequeaths to one Kenneth Brown $5; to a son, Samuel W. Abrams, contestant herein, some items of household goods, pictures and furniture; and to her other son, Earl B. Abrams, proponent of the -will, the residue of testatrix’s personal estate. The will was witnessed by one witness, Dora Large. It bears no date. It was offered for probate by Earl B. Abrams. Samuel W. Abrams filed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of McMahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Heffner v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
  3. Hill v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Bingel v. VolzIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Waller v. WallerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1845

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. Munson v. SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. STRICKLEN v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
  4. Coplin v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Coplin v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API