Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of McMahon

California Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1917No. S. F. No. 7779PublishedCited by 40 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the guperior Court of the City and County of gan Francisco admitting a will to probate. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

In this ease a written instrument was admitted to probate as the last will and testament of Elizabeth E. McMahon, deceased. The writing was unwitnessed and unattested. It was therefore olographic in its nature. In its exordium it declared: “This is the last will and testament of Elizabeth E. McMahon.” Following this the writing contained certain specific bequests and devises, with a residuary clause, and a clause appointing an executor. It concluded as follows: “I do hereby publish and declare the foregoing, entirely written, dated and signed by my own hand, to be my last will and testament,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Estate of ManchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Estate of ButtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Estate of BernardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. In Re Irvine's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Shoults v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Estate of MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API