Coplin v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentHalley, Justice
I cannot concur in the majority opinion. It is contrary to our statutory law as heretofore clearly declared by this Court. When an instrument purporting to be the will of a soldier serving in a foreign country is presented for probate it is only natural that we make every effort to give effect to any instrument that appears to disclose his intentions and desires as to the disposition of his property. This is especially true where, as here, the soldier dies in the service of his country soon after making an effort to express his desires as to the disposition of his property.
However, it is not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hill v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Noyes v. GerardMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- Knauff v. DavidsonArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Succession of ArmantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
- In Re Stover's WillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.