Legal Opinion

Brame v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 30, 1986No. 58-84CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This is a civilian pay case which comes before this court on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff brought this suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1982), alleging that he was improperly removed from his position as a custodial employee/messenger on the rolls of the United States Court of Claims. Plaintiff seeks backpay, reinstatement to his job or to a comparable job, costs and attorneys fees. After a careful review of the pleadings, the submitted papers and the parties’ briefs, the court concludes that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Monroe v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  2. National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  3. Diaz-Carrasquillo v. Garcia-PadillaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  4. Kelley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Philip L. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API