Brame v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This is a civilian pay case which comes before this court on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff brought this suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1982), alleging that he was improperly removed from his position as a custodial employee/messenger on the rolls of the United States Court of Claims. Plaintiff seeks backpay, reinstatement to his job or to a comparable job, costs and attorneys fees. After a careful review of the pleadings, the submitted papers and the parties’ briefs, the court concludes that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Monroe v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Diaz-Carrasquillo v. Garcia-PadillaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Kelley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Philip L. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.