Legal Opinion

Yancey v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 25, 2000No. CA CR 99-1360PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Margaret Meads, Judge.

Appellants, Curtis Yancey and Lee Cloud, each appeal from their conditional pleas of guilty to one count of possession of a controlled substance (marijuana) with intent to deliver, a Class C felony, for which each received four months in a regional punishment facility followed by four years’ probation and a $2,000 fine. By agreement of the parties, these cases were consolidated for trial purposes. On appeal, appellants argue that the trial judge erred in refusing to grant their motions to suppress evidence found at their residences. We affirm. When reviewing a trial…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. Candelario Angulo-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yancey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Yancey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API