Legal Opinion
Yancey v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 24, 2001No. CR 00-1310Published
1Opinion of the Court
44 S.W.3d 315 (2001)
345 Ark. 103
Curtis Hoyt YANCEY and Lee Roy Cloud
v.
STATE of Arkansas.
No. CR 00-1310.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
May 24, 2001.
Sam T. Huer and James T. Lessmeister, Little Rock, for appellants.
Mark Pryor, Att'y Gen., by Jeffrey Weber, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.
JIM HANNAH, Justice.
Appellants Lee Roy Cloud and Curtis Hoyt Yancey appeal their conviction and sentence for violation of Arkansas Code Annotated Section 5-64-401 (Supp.1999), for possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver. Both appellants filed conditional pleas of guilty pursuant…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.