Legal Opinion

Yancey v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 24, 2001No. CR 00-1310PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Justice.

Appellants Lee Roy Cloud and Curtis Hoyt Yancey appeal their conviction and sentence for violation of Arkansas Code Annotated Section 5-64-401 (Supp. 1999), for possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver. Both appellants filed conditional pleas of guilty pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b), whereby they reserved their right to appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion to suppress evidence seized during the a search of their homes. Both appellants were sentenced to four months confinement and four years probation.

This case was appealed to…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Coggin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Polk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Barbee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API