Legal Opinion
United States v. Askegard
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 2, 2003No. 01-845 (RLE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
At Duluth, in the District of Minnesota, this 2nd day of July, 2003.
I. Introduction
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to the consent of the parties, as authorized by Title 18 U.S.C. § 636(c), upon the Motion of the Defendants for Summary Judgment on statute of limitations grounds. At a Hearing on the Motion, the Government appeared by Mary E. Bielefeld, Assistant United States Attorney, and the Defendants appeared by Jon J. Jensen, Esq. For reasons which follow, we deny the Defendants’ Motion.
II.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Barbara McLaughlin v. Esselte Pendaflex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grapevine Imports, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- United States v. GodleyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2015
- United States v. AskegardDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005