United States v. Askegard
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the consent of the parties, as authorized by the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The Court Trial of this action commenced, and was completed, on February 10, 2004. Thereafter, the parties submitted post-Trial briefs, with the last such brief having been filed with the Court on April 6, 2004, at which time, the matter was taken under advisement. At the time of Trial, the Government appeared by Mary E. Bielefeld, Trial Attorney, Tax Division,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Edward J. AhrensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Daniel A. Wright and Lois W. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Robert M. Cole, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant, Group II Commercial Real Estate, Inc., a California Corporation, on CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. GodleyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2015