Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Friedell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1944No. 33,772PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Streissguth, Justice.

Plaintiff, as vendee under a contract for deed to certain hotel property in Rochester, sued for specific performance of the contract by defendants Hiller and Friedell, his vendors, and asked for judgment determining the persons entitled to the unpaid balance of the purchase price, and specifically determining that certain judgments against defendant Friedell, antedating the contract for deed, be declared not to constitute a lien upon the property. Friedell’s creditors appeal from a judgment granting plaintiff the relief he asked.

The contract for deed was entered into on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Dull v. BlackmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Henderson v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Tutt v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Exsted v. ExstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Lunning v. Land O'LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. DeShields v. BroadwaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Henschke v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. W. H. Barber Co. v. McNamara-Vivant Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API