Boam v. Trident Financial Corp.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANING, Acting P. J.
Defendants Trident Financial Corporation et al., appeal a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs Keith Boam et al., 1 in plaintiffs’ action for rescission of a limited partnership agreement, violation of California securities laws, and negligence. Defendants contend the damages were excessive as a matter of law because plaintiffs could have mitigated their losses, and because plaintiffs’ own conduct was the proximate cause of certain losses on their investments.
In their appeal, plaintiffs contend the jury erroneously failed to include interest on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Bowden v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Zalkind v. Ceradyne, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Berman v. BrombergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- California Amplifier, Inc. v. RLI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Viterbi v. WassermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.