Legal Opinion

Hatchett v. Going

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1926No. 16460PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBidet, J.

This is an appeal from a judg-: ment of the district court of Payne county wherein A. P. Hatchett, plaintiff in error, as relator in the< court below, sought and secured an alternative writ of mandamus against defendant in error, W. E. Going, as county treasurer of Payne county, respondent below. The alternative writ directed. Going as suc-h officer to show cause why a valid tax deed should not be executed by him conveying to the relator certain property of which relator had .been the purchaser at a resale for the nonpayment of taxes. W. E. Going, respondent, made return to the alternative…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pillow v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Turpin v. LemonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Keller v. HawkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Cochran v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Weeks v. MerkleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Swan v. KuehnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. McNaughton v. BeattieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Winters v. BirchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Patteson v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Cheney v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API