Legal Opinion
Creely v. HCR ManorCare, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 9, 2011No. Case 3:09 CV 2879, 3:10 CV 417, 3:10 CV 2200, 10 CV 270PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.
Introduction
Before the Court are Motions for Conditional Certification in two eases seeking collective action status under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (Creely Doc. Nos. 34-35; Conteh Doc. Nos. 26-29). 1 The cases present similar issues regarding Defendant employers’ timekeeping policy of automatically deducting thirty minutes from hourly employees’ timecards when the employee works more than a set number of hours (the “auto-deduct policy”). The disputes in these cases, and this Court’s Opinion, add another…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- O'BRIEN v. Ed Donnelly Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Kim Comer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Young v. Cooper Cameron Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Leuthold v. Destination America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Chao v. Gotham Registry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Waggoner v. U.S. BancorpDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Korenblum v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Myers v. Marietta Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Bergman v. Kindred Healthcare, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Hall v. U.S. Cargo & Courier Serv., LLC.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.