Legal Opinion
Kim Comer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 19, 2006No. 05-1761PublishedCited by 301 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Chief Judge.
Wal-Mart appeals the district court’s January 4, 2005, order granting the motion of plaintiffs, former Wal-Mart Assistant Store Managers (ASMs), to approve notice to advise ASMs employed at any time in the past three years in Wal-Mart’s Region 3 (comprising Michigan, Northern Indiana, and Northern Ohio) of their rights under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and to furnish them an opportunity to opt into plaintiffs’ lawsuit pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). We DISMISS Wal-Mart’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
I
Section 207(a) of the FLSA requires employers to pay…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Morisky v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Pritchard v. Dent Wizard International Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Thiessen v. General Electric Capital Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by301 opinions
- Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Brooke Clark v. A&L Homecare &Training Ctr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Margaret White v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Edward Monroe v. FTS USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- James Frye v. Baptist Memorial Hospital, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
296 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.