Legal Opinion

Waggoner v. U.S. Bancorp

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 24, 2015No. Case No. 5:14cv1626PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SARA LIOI, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the motion of plaintiffs, Kelly Waggoner and Darbey Schultz, seeking conditional certification of a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 etseq. (Doc. No. 20 [“Mot.”]). U.S. Ban-corp and U.S. Bank National Association (collectively referred to as “defendant” or “U.S. Bank”), opposes the motion (Doc. 27 [“Opp’n”]), and plaintiffs have filed a reply (Doc. No. 31 [“Reply”]). U.S. Bank has sought leave to file a sur-reply and has attached a proposed sur-reply to its motion…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. O'BRIEN v. Ed Donnelly Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Kim Comer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Morisky v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  5. Lewis v. Huntington National BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Myers v. Marietta Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
  2. Nicks v. Koch Meat Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Brittmon v. Upreach, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
  4. Meyer v. Panera Bread Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Adams v. Wenco Ashland, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API