Legal Opinion

Matlock v. Davis

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided January 24, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00035Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION GRANT MATLOCK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Cause No. 1:20-CV-35-HAB ) SHANNON PAIGE DAVIS, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Grant Matlock, proceeding pro se, filed a Civil Complaint (ECF No. 1) against Shannon Paige Davis. Plaintiff also filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 2). Both documents were filed on January 21, 2020. For the reasons set forth below, the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave is DENIED. The Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), and he is GRANTED…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Tara Luevano v. Walmart Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API