In Re the Support Obligation of Do Rego
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Justice
[¶ 1.] In November of 1999, after receiving financial assistance from the State of South Dakota, Vickie sought past and future child support payments from Carlos Do Rego (Do Rego). The circuit court found that the presumption of legitimacy precluded Do Rego’s support obligation and denied Vickie’s claim. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] Do Rego and Vickie were romantically involved beginning in 1985 and ending in the fall of 1987. This relationship included several sexual encounters. After the last encounter, in either late October or early November of 1987, Vickie phoned Do Rego,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cole v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF HURONSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Kessler v. LoersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Cole v. Bd. of Adjustment of the City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Kessler's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chapman v. ChapmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Department of Social Services of South Dakota Ex Rel. Wright v. ByerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Department of Social Services of the State Ex Rel. Wright v. ByerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- STATE EX REL. WERNKE v. CortezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Department of Social Services of South Dakota Ex Rel. Wright v. ByerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.