Legal Opinion

Schmier v. Supreme Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 2000No. A085177PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANING, J.=

Michael Schmier (appellant) appeals the dismissal of his complaint for injunctive relief and writ of mandate after the demurrer of respondents, the Supreme Court of California, the Court of Appeal of California and the Judicial Council of California, was sustained without leave to amend. Appellant seeks to enjoin respondents from enforcing the rules governing publication of opinions (California Rules of Court, 1 rules 976-979), contending they are unconstitutional and conflict with statutory law.

Background

Rule 976(b) provides that no opinion of the Court of Appeal -may be…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Martin v. Bridgeport Community Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Blumhorst v. JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. People v. SumahitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Schmier v. Supreme CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Zond, LLC v. Fujitsu Semiconductor Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API