State v. Silva
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
This appeal is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. In State v. Silva, 285 Conn. 447, 461, 939 A.2d 581 (2008), the Supreme Court reversed our decision in State v. Silva, 93 Conn. App. 349, 889 A.2d 834 (2006), with direction to consider the *490remaining claim of the defendant, Madalena Silva, on appeal. The remaining claim is that the trial court improperly instructed the jury as to consciousness of guilt.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The facts relevant to our resolution of the remaining claim are as follows. “At about 5 p.m. on June 22, 2003, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. LusterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SalmondConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. NanceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. TownsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. CarlsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- State v. PughConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.