Legal Opinion

Miller v. Engle

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1906No. Civ. No. 167PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

This is an action commenced under sections 3414 and 3415 of the Political Code to determine the right to purchase certain lieu lands as indemnity for school land upon a contest between plaintiff and defendant, Donovan, on reference by the surveyor general as register of the state land office, to the superior court of Plumas county. J. M. Engle, by leave of court, filed a complaint in intervention as the assignee of defendant’s certificate of purchase. Plaintiff moved to strike from the files the complaint in intervention, and also filed a general demurrer to the same. The motion was denied,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barney v. DolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Simmons v. WagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Jennings v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Taylor v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. McFaul v. PfankuchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. In Re East Bay Etc. Water Bonds of 1925California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Doxstater v. Northwest Cities Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Merchants Nat. Bk. v. Continental Nat. Bk.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Greenbush Cemetery Ass'n v. Van NattaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API