Legal Opinion

Manufacturers' Paper Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 20, 1912No. 737PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 26111 (T. D. 31757).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The importation in this case consisted of lava stone 6 or 6 feet in length, about 9 inches in depth, by 5 inches in width, the longer sides *73converging so that a cross section of the stone-would not show as a parallelogram but somewhat wedge-shaped. In their use they are fitted into an iron drum, the reduced edge of the stone being inserted in the pocket of the drum and cémented in. In its completed form this drum with the stone surface is used for grinding up paper pulp. As imported, the surface of the stone is left rough, but on the 5-inch side of the stone grooves are cut from one-half to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heath & Milligan Manufacturing Co. v. WorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  3. Athenia Steel & Wire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Austin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Otagiri Mercantile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Domestic Marble & Stone Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Kubierschky v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  4. United States v. Grasselli Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. United States v. Manufacturers' Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API