Legal Opinion

Austin v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 17, 1911No. 462PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Transferred from United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York, Abstract 14687 (T. D. 27999), Abstract 14832 (T. D. 28036).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of General Appraisers holding the importation in question dutiable under paragraph 118 of the tariff act of 1897. The protest claims the articles dutiable under paragraph 97 and alternatively under section 6. The four paragraphs in question read as follows:

117. Freestone, granite, sandstone, limestone, and other building or monumental stone, except marble and onyx, unmanufactured or undressed, not specially provided for in this act, twelve cents per cubic foot.

*511118. Freestone, granite, sandstone, limestone, and other building or monumental…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Otagiri Mercantile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Manufacturers' Paper Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Kubierschky v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  4. Protest 872085-G of Joseph Bermel, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1939
  5. Selectile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API