Legal Opinion

United States v. Grasselli Chemical Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 20, 1913No. 940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract28511 (T. D. 32529).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The merchandise in question consists of hewn lava stone cut into special shapes adapted for use and used as linings for the towers or chimneys of factories. Duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 114 of the tariff act of 1909, which provides for—

Freestone, granite, sandstone, limestone, and all other monumental or building stone, except marble, breccia, and onyx, not specially provided for in this section, hewn, dressed, or polished, or otherwise manufactured, * * *.

The protest made various claims, but the reliance of the importer seems to be that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Manufacturers' Paper Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kubierschky v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  2. United States v. Manufacturers' Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Castelazo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Selectile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API