Legal Opinion

McCleery v. Woodmen of the World

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.

The complaint alleges, in substance, as follows: On March 13, 1926, Charles E. Young, a member of the Woodmen of the World, a benevolent and fraternal corporation, was the holder of a benefit certificate in the Woodmen of the World, in the amount of $3,000. At that time Young made an offer in writing to the plaintiff D. W. McCleery, a stepson of Young, that if McCleery would keep up the dues and assessments and would agree to pay the benevolent and fraternal corporation the sum of $5.50 every two months, so long as Young should live, he would cause the certificate, in so far as the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jory v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Wist v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W.Oregon Supreme Court · 1892
  3. McCall v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Crawford v. NolanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. Freitas v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stinemeyer v. Wesco Farms, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Colovos' Adm'r v. GouvasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. Adams v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Ralph Wolff & Sons v. New Zealand Insurance Co. of AucklandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API