State v. Jensen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Defendant, who was found guilty by a district court jury of aggravated robbery, Minn. St. 609.245, contends on this appeal from judgment of conviction that (1) the trial court committed both constitutional and nonconstitutional error in admitting a gun seized from the automobile in which defendant was arrested, (2) the trial court erred in admitting certain other-crime evidence, and (3) the prosecutor committed misconduct in his closing argument. After careful consideration, we affirm.
We do not think it is necessary to discuss either of the first two issues in detail. As to the first issue,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. KotkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Rairdon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.