State v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals from convictions for burglary, aggravated assault, and attempted aggravated robbery and from the denial of an alternative motion for judgment of acquittal or for a new trial. We affirm.
Because the court reporter temporarily lost his preliminary hearing notes, a transcript of the preliminary hearing was not available for use at the trial which defendant contends denied him an opportunity to impeach the prosecutor’s witness. We recognize that such a transcript is valuable both as a discovery tool and for impeachment purposes. Britt v. North Carolina, 404 U. S. 226, 92 S. Ct.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mary P. Reynolds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Martinez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- John D. Shaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. HouleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. MontjoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. BeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.