Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 5, 1996No. C6-94-1793PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
Carlos Orlando Smith appeals his convictions of first-degree murder, Minn.Stat. § 609.185 (1992), second-degree murder, Minn.Stat. § 609.19 (1992), and aggravated robbery, Minn.Stat. § 609.245 (1992), which arose out of the robbery and beating of Raymond Barnett and the shooting of Dural Woods. We affirm.
On October 5, 1993, at approximately 10 p.m., Smith, Shane Pierson, Antonio Hud-speth, and John Edmundson drove to St. Paul from Minneapolis. Smith was carrying a gun and admitted that he usually carried a gun to protect himself when selling drugs. Upon reaching…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. RourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. QuickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. StewardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.