Legal Opinion

Bell Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1937No. Appeal, 53PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania has appealed from an order of the Public Service Commission (now Public Utility Commission) reading: “Now, to wit, December 8, 1936, it is ordered: That the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, respondent, pay to Dr. Caroline M. White, within fifteen (15) days from date of service hereof, the sum of $91.50, with simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum upon the individual amounts comprising the said sum of $91.50 from the several dates of payment thereof to the date of repayment.”

Appellant contends this order is not in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Centre County Lime Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Centre County Lime Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Long's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
  5. Kunze v. Duquesne CitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pope v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Mezanko v. Blue Coal Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1974
  4. Philadelphia v. Halpern, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API