Legal Opinion

Kunze v. Duquesne City

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1936No. Appeals, 253 and 254PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The question involved in each of these appeals is whether the owner of a property in a third class city against which property an assessment has been made for a municipal improvement has the right of appeal from an award of viewers. The two appeals were disposed of by the court below in one opinion, were argued together in this court and will be considered by us in one opinion.

One case involved an assessment of benefits for street paving and the other an assessment for the construction of a sewer in the city of Duquesne, a third class city. To avoid confusion we will give…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Michener v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Kille v. Reading Iron WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  4. Lower Chichester Twp. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Lane v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Bell Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Frabotta v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1955
  5. Philadelphia Civil Service Commission v. Connolly, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API