Oregon Lumber Export Co. v. Tohto Shipping Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER QUASHING ATTACHMENT AND GARNISHMENT AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS
BOLDT, Chief Judge.
Defendants TOHTO SHIPPING, CO., LTD. and NARASAKI SANGYO, K. K. have moved to quash plaintiff’s attachment and garnishment of monies and to stay this ease pending the outcome of arbitration under the charter party contract on which plaintiff’s claims in this suit are based. Counsel for all parties have had ample opportunity to present memoranda of authorities, affidavits and oral argument, all of which the Court has fully considered.
Supplemental Rule B, F.R. Civ.P., permits attachment and garnishment of monies…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kulukundis Shipping Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Tepper Realty Company v. Mosaic Tile CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- United States v. Cia. Naviera Continental S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Murphy v. Arrow Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- Murphy v. A/S SobralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
3Cited by5 opinions
- Western Bulk Carriers (Australia), Pty. Ltd. v. P.S. International, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- 20th Century Fox Film Corp. v. M.V. Ship Agencies, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1997
- Cobelfret-Cie Belge v. Samick Lines Co., Ltd.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1982
- West of England Ship Owners Mutual Insurance v. McAllister Bros.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Nea Armonia Ship. Co., Ltd. v. Antco Ship. Co., Ltd.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1976