Legal Opinion
West of England Ship Owners Mutual Insurance v. McAllister Bros.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 26, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 93-3912PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BARTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, The West of England Ship Owners Mutual Insurance Association (Luxem*123bourg) (“West of England”), has filed a verified complaint contending that the defendants owe it over $1,200,000 in calls or premiums under a maritime insurance contract. Upon the filing of the complaint, plaintiff, pursuant to Rule B of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims (“Rule B”), obtained from the Court an Order attaching two tugs, The Eñe McAllister and The James McAllister, which are owned by defendant McAllister Towing and Transportation Co., Inc.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seawind Compania, S. A. v. Crescent Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Igneri v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Oregon Lumber Export Co. v. Tohto Shipping Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Submersible Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. Perforadora Central, S.A. De C v. Defendant/appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Caribbean Yacht Works, Ltd. v. M/V "Neenah Z," U.K.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- West of England Ship Owners Mutual Insurance v. McAllister Bros.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Submersible Sys Inc v. Perforadora Ctrl S ACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001