Legal Opinion
Cobelfret-Cie Belge v. Samick Lines Co., Ltd.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 20, 1982No. Admiralty C81-1365B, C81-1382BPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
BEEKS, Senior District Judge.
In two separate actions which the Court has consolidated for the purpose of this memorandum, plaintiffs Cobelfret-Cie Beige (No. C81-1365) and Tarpon Shipping Co. (No. C81-1381) each sued defendant Samick Lines, alleging a breach of their respective charters. Pursuant to Supplemental Rule B for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, Fed.R.Civ.P., and LAR 15, Local Rules W.D.Wash., plaintiffs each attached the M/S SAMICK ATLANTIC, a vessel owned by defendant and then anchored in Elliott Bay at Seattle, Washington. The attachments were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Grand Bahama Petroleum Co. v. Canadian Transportation Agencies, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1978
- Murphy v. Arrow Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- Oregon v. Tug Go GetterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Colon v. Gulf Trading Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1985
- Western Bulk Carriers (Australia), Pty. Ltd. v. P.S. International, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Parcel Tankers, Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Usher v. M/V OCEAN WAVEDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1992